Book Review: Philosophy of the Quran by Ghulam Sarwar
![]() |
Philosophy of the Quran |
Book Review: Philosophy of the Quran by Ghulam Sarwar
Before Buying, Better to Read the Book Review: Philosophy of the Quran by Ghulam Sarwar by Legaproblema.com - What does it mean to explore the Quran philosophically? How does one approach a sacred text not merely as a source of spiritual guidance but also as a deep well of intellectual inquiry? Philosophy of the Quran by Ghulam Sarwar is a groundbreaking effort in this direction. Published in 1938, this work invites readers to look beyond the surface of Quranic verses and examine the rich philosophical underpinnings embedded within them. Sarwar, with clarity and conviction, attempts to illuminate the intellectual structure of the Quran, addressing age-old questions about existence, ethics, knowledge, and divine will through an Islamic lens.
At a time when Islamic societies were grappling with colonial influence, modernity, and the rise of secular thought, Sarwar contribution was a clarion call for re-engagement with the Quran as a living text—capable not only of spiritual enlightenment but also of rational, philosophical dialogue.
Book Details
Author
Language
Publisher
Page
Genre
Structure and Contents
What foundational themes define the Philosophy of the Quran as articulated by Ghulam Sarwar? This book follows a structured philosophical inquiry into the essence of Islamic thought, capturing both metaphysical and practical dimensions. The contents are arranged in a logical sequence, starting with an introduction to philosophical concepts and leading into a deeper exploration of ethics, human existence, and the nature of God.
Here are seven key points from the structure of the book:
-
What is Philosophy
The book begins with the fundamental question: What is philosophy? Ghulam Sarwar explains philosophy as a systematic way of thinking about reality, truth, and values, while also showing how the Quran serves as a unique source of philosophy within Islamic tradition. -
The Nature of Unity or The Whole: Infinity and Zero
This section discusses the concept of Tawhid (the Oneness of God) in the context of universal philosophy. Sarwar uses the symbolism of "infinity and zero" to demonstrate the perfection of God and humanity’s inability to fully comprehend the totality of existence. -
The Attributes of God and Other Matters Connected Therewith
Here, the author delves into God’s attributes, such as Omniscience, Justice, and Mercy. He explains how these attributes are not merely theological concepts but also the foundation for understanding philosophy regarding justice, freedom, and responsibility. -
The Universe; Life; Man – His Evolution
This section offers a view of the creation of the universe and the evolution of humanity within a Qur’anic framework. Sarwar highlights how humans are endowed with intellectual and spiritual capacities to understand and interpret life. -
The Soul
In this chapter, Sarwar discusses the soul as a spiritual reality. He explores the concept of the soul in the Quran, compares it with Western views, and shows the role of the soul in achieving true happiness and the purpose of life. -
Ethics or Moral Philosophy
Ethics is central to Islamic philosophy in Sarwar view. He links moral values such as honesty, justice, and compassion to Quranic teachings and emphasizes how these values should form the basis of both individual and social life. -
The Idea of God
As the pinnacle of philosophical exploration, this chapter summarizes the understanding of God as the source of ultimate truth. Sarwar demonstrates how the concept of God in Islam is not in conflict with reason and philosophy but rather reinforces it.
Strong Points of the Book
Sarwar Philosophy of the Quran is distinguished by several strengths that have secured its place in the history of Islamic thought:
Comprehensive Analysis
The book does not limit itself to exegesis or legal commentary. It attempts to draw a full philosophical system from the Quran, addressing metaphysics, ethics, epistemology, and anthropology. This holistic approach is rare, especially among English-language works of its time.
Clarity of Expression
Despite the complex themes he discusses, Sarwar maintains a readable and engaging style. He avoids technical jargon and ensures that even non-academic readers can follow his arguments without losing depth or precision.
Bridging Traditions
Perhaps the book’s greatest success lies in its ability to build a bridge between classical Islamic scholarship and modern Western philosophical inquiry. Sarwar references both traditional Islamic thinkers (like Al-Ghazali and Ibn Sina) and the secular philosophical concerns of the 20th century, showing how the Quran remains relevant to both.
Impact and Legacy
Philosophy of the Quran was ahead of its time. At a moment when Islamic discourse was largely focused on apologetics or basic religious education, Sarwar decision to frame the Quran as a philosophical text marked a bold intellectual move. His book influenced a generation of scholars who sought to make Islam intellectually robust in the face of modern challenges.
While the book may not be as widely read today, it laid the groundwork for later explorations into Quranic thought by thinkers such as Fazlur Rahman, Seyyed Hossein Nasr, and Muhammad Iqbal. Sarwar work is frequently cited in academic discussions on Islamic philosophy, particularly for its pioneering status.
![]() |
Ghulam Sarwar |
Criticism of the Book
No work is without critique, and Sarwar contribution has drawn thoughtful responses from scholars over the decades:
Historical Limitations
Being a product of the early 20th century, Sarwar framework lacks engagement with many contemporary issues such as postmodernism, feminist interpretations, and post-colonial critiques of religion. This limits the book’s utility in some modern academic settings.
Interpretative Scope
Some critics argue that Sarwar reading of the Quran is largely Sunni, rationalist, and somewhat reductionist. While he emphasizes reason and morality, he does not fully explore mystical or esoteric dimensions found in traditions like Sufism or Shi'a philosophy.
Comparison with Similar Works
Several other works have attempted to engage the Quran in a philosophical light. Among them:
-
Islam: Beliefs and Teachings by Ghulam Sarwar – While not philosophical in tone, this book lays foundational Islamic beliefs for English-speaking audiences and showcases Sarwar pedagogical clarity.
-
A Fresh Look at the Quran by Syed Ghulam Sarwar – A contemporary reinterpretation that seeks to rescue the Quran from ritualism and return to its core messages. It complements Ghulam Sarwar philosophical lens with a more modern, reformist tone.
-
The Quran and the Secular Mind by Shabbir Akhtar – A deeper, more academic dive into how the Quran confronts and interacts with Western secular thought, carrying forward the kind of inquiry Ghulam Sarwar initiated.
Each of these works builds upon or diverges from Sarwar legacy, but none quite replicate his unique fusion of accessibility and philosophical depth.
Exploring 'Islam and the Secular Mind
Sarwar insights also remain vital in contemporary debates about the relationship between Islam and secularism. In an age where secular humanism often claims a monopoly on rationality and ethics, Philosophy of the Quran offers a counterpoint—showing how divine revelation can not only coexist with reason but enrich it.While later thinkers like Shabbir Akhtar and Fazlur Rahman have advanced these discussions, Sarwar early contributions laid a conceptual foundation for such engagement. His work implicitly argues that the Quran provides answers to philosophical dilemmas that secular paradigms leave unresolved.
Understanding 'Philosophy in the Quran
One of the key contributions of Sarwar work is the assertion that the Quran is not merely a religious document but a philosophical one. By treating the Quran as a text that wrestles with the deepest questions of existence, he challenges both secular scholars who dismiss its intellectual rigor and religious readers who restrict its interpretation to ritual or law.His treatment of concepts like tawheed, fitrah, hikmah, and ma'rifah demonstrates the Quran’s intellectual architecture—a system of thought that is internally coherent and profoundly meaningful.
The Quran and Modern Thought
In our present moment—marked by existential anxiety, moral relativism, and philosophical fragmentation—the Quran’s coherent ethical and metaphysical worldview presents both a challenge and a balm. Sarwar anticipates these crises, asserting that the Quran speaks to modern issues with timeless wisdom.He shows that rather than retreat from intellectual discourse, Muslims must contribute to it—armed not only with faith, but also with philosophical rigor rooted in their sacred text.
Final Thoughts
Ghulam Sarwar Philosophy of the Quran is more than a book—it is a call to think deeply, to read the Quran not just as a source of comfort but as a work of enduring philosophical insight. Despite being written nearly a century ago, it continues to resonate with readers who seek to understand the Quran beyond the surface.By weaving together clarity, scholarship, and a deep respect for tradition, Sarwar has offered the Muslim world—and indeed, the wider world—a rich intellectual resource. For students of philosophy, scholars of religion, and spiritually curious minds alike, this work remains a hidden gem worthy of renewed attention.
After reading this book, usually people also search as following: philosophical verses in Quran, the meaning and concept of philosophy in Islam, what is Islamic philosophy PDF, Islamic philosophers, Islamic philosophy summary, sources of Islamic philosophy, relationship between Islam and philosophy, Arabic philosophers.
Then some of them also have some following questions:
- What is the main philosophy of Islam?
- Is the Quran a philosophy book?
- What are the principles of the Quran?
- What is the main concept of the Quran?
- What are the 3 main beliefs of Islam?
- Who is the father of Islamic philosophy?
- What is the moral philosophy of Islam?
- Is Islam a religion or philosophy?
0Comments